Integrating biobanking could produce significant cost benefits and minimise inbreeding for Australian amphibian captive breeding programs

dc.contributor.authorLachlan G. Howell
dc.contributor.authorPeter R. Mawson
dc.contributor.authorRichard Frankham
dc.contributor.authorJohn C. Rodger
dc.contributor.authorRose Upton
dc.contributor.authorRyan R. Witt
dc.contributor.authorNatalie E. Calatayud
dc.contributor.authorSimon Clulow
dc.contributor.authorJohn Clulow
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:13:22Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:13:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 28
dc.description.abstractCaptive breeding is an important tool for amphibian conservation despite high economic costs and deleterious genetic effects of sustained captivity and unavoidably small colony sizes. Integration of biobanking and assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) could provide solutions to these challenges, but is rarely used due to lack of recognition of the potential benefits and clear policy direction. Here we present compelling genetic and economic arguments to integrate biobanking and ARTs into captive breeding programs using modelled captive populations of two Australian threatened frogs, namely the orange-bellied frog Geocrinia vitellina and the white bellied frog Geocrinia alba . Back-crossing with frozen founder spermatozoa using ARTs every generation minimises rates of inbreeding and provides considerable reductions in colony size and program costs compared with conventional captive management. Biobanking could allow captive institutions to meet or exceed longstanding genetic retention targets (90% of source population heterozygosity over 100 years). We provide a broad policy direction that could make biobanking technology a practical reality across Australia's ex situ management of amphibians in current and future holdings. Incorporating biobanking technology widely across this network could deliver outcomes by maintaining high levels of source population genetic diversity and freeing economic resources to develop ex situ programs for a greater number of threatened amphibian species.
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/rd21058
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1071/rd21058
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/45253
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofReproduction Fertility and Development
dc.sourceHigher University of San Andrés
dc.subjectThreatened species
dc.subjectCaptive breeding
dc.subjectInbreeding
dc.subjectBiology
dc.subjectCaptivity
dc.subjectPopulation
dc.subjectBiobank
dc.subjectAmphibian
dc.subjectGenetic diversity
dc.subjectEcology
dc.titleIntegrating biobanking could produce significant cost benefits and minimise inbreeding for Australian amphibian captive breeding programs
dc.typearticle

Files