Understanding the certainty of evidence from systematic reviews in rehabilitation science: what do clinicians need to know about GRADE?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorJavier Martínez-Calderón
dc.contributor.authorCristina García‐Muñoz
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T21:05:12Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T21:05:12Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 1
dc.description.abstractThe use of GRADE is essential for improving the synthesis of evidence that clinicians may often use in rehabilitation practice. However, GRADE is only one hallmark when the findings of systematic reviews are interpreted. The issues of sample size, futile research, pre-registration, switching outcomes, or narrative bias should be also considered.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09638288.2024.2355304
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2355304
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/85846
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInforma
dc.relation.ispartofDisability and Rehabilitation
dc.sourceUniversidad de Sevilla
dc.subjectGrading (engineering)
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectPsychological intervention
dc.subjectPhysical therapy
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectEvidence-based medicine
dc.subjectAlternative medicine
dc.subjectCertainty
dc.titleUnderstanding the certainty of evidence from systematic reviews in rehabilitation science: what do clinicians need to know about GRADE?
dc.typereview

Files

Collections

Artículo Científico Publicado