El gobierno entre las decisiones correctas y decisiones populares frente al gasolinazo del 2010. Una investigación documental

dc.contributor.authorMiguel Angel Osco Antiñapa
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T19:56:39Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T19:56:39Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThis research analyzes the tension between the Correct Decision (DC) and the Popular Decision (DP) in economic governance. The study introduces this dual conceptual framework, based on Jean-Paul Sartre’s existentialist philosophy, arguing that the DP constitutes an act of political "bad faith." The illustrative case study is Bolivia’s 2010 "Gasolinazo." The government attempted a DC (subsidy elimination) to curb fiscal drain and smuggling, but massive social pressure forced an immediate reversal to the DP (subsidy restoration). It is concluded that by choosing the DP, the leadership relinquished its technical responsibility for political expediency, mortgaging the country’s economic future. The current crisis of foreign currency and fuel shortages observed in 2024 and 2025 is the direct consequence of the 2010 act of "bad faith." Authentic democracy requires the government to assume the correct decisions, even if unpopular, to ensure national sustainability.
dc.identifier.doi10.71112/qwjxz305
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.71112/qwjxz305
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/79055
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Multidisciplinar Epistemología de las Ciencias
dc.sourceUniversidad Pública de El Alto
dc.subjectPolitics
dc.subjectGovernment (linguistics)
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectWelfare economics
dc.subjectExistentialism
dc.subjectEconomic shortage
dc.subjectCurrency
dc.subjectDemocracy
dc.subjectDual (grammatical number)
dc.subjectPolitical economy
dc.titleEl gobierno entre las decisiones correctas y decisiones populares frente al gasolinazo del 2010. Una investigación documental
dc.typearticle

Files