Interrupción civil del plazo de prescripción de acciones en materia laboral. Comentario a la sentencia de la Corte Suprema (Cuarta Sala), de 25 de julio de 2018

dc.contributor.authorEdmundo Piffre de Voban Barrón
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T18:05:13Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T18:05:13Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractFiling a legal action has substantive and procedural effects. In labor matters, the “requirement” expression contained in Civil Code, article 2523 N°2, must be understood as filing a lawsuit in courts, which is a substantive aspect of a legal action. As a result, a legal notification is not required to interrupt civilly the statute of limitations.
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/68027
dc.language.isoes
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectLawsuit
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectStatute
dc.subjectAction (physics)
dc.subjectHumanities
dc.titleInterrupción civil del plazo de prescripción de acciones en materia laboral. Comentario a la sentencia de la Corte Suprema (Cuarta Sala), de 25 de julio de 2018
dc.typearticle

Files