Interrupción civil del plazo de prescripción de acciones en materia laboral. Comentario a la sentencia de la Corte Suprema (Cuarta Sala), de 25 de julio de 2018
| dc.contributor.author | Edmundo Piffre de Voban Barrón | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T18:05:13Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T18:05:13Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Filing a legal action has substantive and procedural effects. In labor matters, the “requirement” expression contained in Civil Code, article 2523 N°2, must be understood as filing a lawsuit in courts, which is a substantive aspect of a legal action. As a result, a legal notification is not required to interrupt civilly the statute of limitations. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/68027 | |
| dc.language.iso | es | |
| dc.source | Universidad de Los Andes | |
| dc.subject | Lawsuit | |
| dc.subject | Political science | |
| dc.subject | Law | |
| dc.subject | Statute | |
| dc.subject | Action (physics) | |
| dc.subject | Humanities | |
| dc.title | Interrupción civil del plazo de prescripción de acciones en materia laboral. Comentario a la sentencia de la Corte Suprema (Cuarta Sala), de 25 de julio de 2018 | |
| dc.type | article |