Indigenous–Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence in the Altiplano

dc.contributor.authorD. A. Villar
dc.contributor.authorBastian Thomsen
dc.contributor.authorAnahi Cosky Paca‐Condori
dc.contributor.authorEdwin R. Gutiérrez Tito
dc.contributor.authorPaula Velásquez-Noriega
dc.contributor.authorEdilio Mamani
dc.contributor.authorMario Vilca
dc.contributor.authorEdmundo G. Moreno Terrazas
dc.contributor.authorJorgelina Mariño
dc.contributor.authorAndrew Gosler
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:22:34Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:22:34Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 8
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding the drivers of conflict and coexistence in human–wildlife relations are critical to conservation. This study sought to understand th varying attitudes of local indigenous people towards wildlife, focusing on the Titicaca Grebe ( Rollandia microptera), an endangered endemic species found in Lake Titicaca and surrounding waters in the Altiplano of Peru and Bolivia. We used an ethnobiology approach to understand which demographic, sociocultural, and economic factors influenced (a) attitudes and local ecological knowledge (LEK) towards the grebe and (2) their effects on Indigenous–wildlife conflict or coexistence. We used a qualitative, semi-structured questionnaire to interview 221 individuals over six months in villages surrounding Lake Titicaca. Participants primarily consisted of locals from the Aymara, Quechan, and Uro Indigenous groups. We found that most individuals expressed apathy towards the grebe, with a significant minority being hostile towards it. Hostility was concentrated amongst fishers and was driven by economic concerns. Knowledge of the grebe was low in the general population, but higher amongst fishers. There was, however, widespread willingness to conserve the grebe amongst the general population, particularly when informed that the grebe is endemic to the Altiplano. This small environmental education intervention suggested increased positive attitudes and a willingness to conserve the grebe. Non-homogenous perspectives towards the grebe were held within and between indigenous groups, suggesting the need for future research into intra-indigenous group dynamics in indigenous–wildlife relations. Future conservation work on the Titicaca Grebe should focus on reducing grebe-fisher conflict, both real and perceived, and on educating people on the grebe's endemic status.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/02780771241246856
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/02780771241246856
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/46147
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ethnobiology
dc.sourceUniversity of Oxford
dc.subjectIndigenous
dc.subjectWildlife
dc.subjectGeography
dc.subjectWildlife conservation
dc.subjectPopulation
dc.subjectWildlife management
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectHuman–wildlife conflict
dc.subjectSocioeconomics
dc.titleIndigenous–Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence in the Altiplano
dc.typearticle

Files