A systematic review and meta‐analysis of new‐onset atrial fibrillation in the context of COVID‐19 infection

dc.contributor.authorSawai Singh Rathore
dc.contributor.authorAkanksha Atulkar
dc.contributor.authorKavya Remala
dc.contributor.authorVanessa Vidaurre Corrales
dc.contributor.authorAmeer Mustafa Farrukh
dc.contributor.authorRavinderjeet Kaur Puar
dc.contributor.authorSem Josue Nsanh Yao
dc.contributor.authorVijaya Durga Pradeep Ganipineni
dc.contributor.authorNirmal Patel
dc.contributor.authorNaganath Thota
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T21:03:50Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T21:03:50Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 7
dc.description.abstractNew-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in COVID-19 raises significant clinical and public health issues. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compile and analyze the current literature on NOAF in COVID-19 and give a more comprehensive understanding of the prevalence and outcomes of NOAF in COVID-19. A comprehensive literature search was carried out using several databases. The random effect model using inverse variance method and DerSimonian and Laird estimator of Tua2 was used to calculate the pooled prevalence and associated 95% confidence interval (CI). Results for outcome analysis were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI and pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. The pooled prevalence of NOAF in COVID-19 was 7.8% (95% CI: 6.54%-9.32%),a pooled estimate from 30 articles (81 929 COVID-19 patients). Furthermore, our analysis reported that COVID-19 patients with NOAF had a higher risk of developing severe disease compared with COVID-19 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 4.78, 95% CI: 3.75-6.09) and COVID-19 patients with a history of pre-existing atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.10-3.59). Similarly, our analysis also indicated that COVID-19 patients with NOAF had a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with, COVID-19 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 3.83, 95% CI: 2.99-4.92) and COVID-19 patients with a history of pre-existing atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.35-3.96). The meta-analysis did not reveal any significant publication bias. The results indicate a strong correlation between NOAF and a higher risk of severe illness and mortality. These results emphasize the importance of careful surveillance, early detection, and customized NOAF management strategies to improve clinical outcomes for COVID-19 patients.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jce.16169
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16169
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/85711
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
dc.sourceInstitute of Medical Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectAtrial fibrillation
dc.subjectInternal medicine
dc.subjectMeta-analysis
dc.subjectOdds ratio
dc.subjectContext (archaeology)
dc.subjectConfidence interval
dc.subjectCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
dc.subjectCardiology
dc.titleA systematic review and meta‐analysis of new‐onset atrial fibrillation in the context of COVID‐19 infection
dc.typereview

Files