Integrated assessment of decentralized wastewater treatment plants in a semi-arid region in Bolivia
| dc.contributor.author | Ivette Echeverría | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramiro Escalera | |
| dc.contributor.author | Oliver Saavedra | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gabriel Aliaga | |
| dc.contributor.author | Renato Montoya | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T14:28:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T14:28:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description | Citaciones: 1 | |
| dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT This study comprehensively evaluates four wastewater treatment plants intended for agricultural reuse in a semi-arid low-moderate temperature region. It considers environmental, technical, economic, and social perspectives. Anaerobic baffled reactors with hybrid gravel filters (ABR + HGF + VGF) proved the most efficient, with moderate requirements in space, O&M, and energy, albeit the highest treatment cost. Up-flow sludge blanket reactor with activated sludge (UASB + AS) demonstrated high efficiency and compactness, with moderate treatment costs. However, it incurred high energy demands, complex O&M, and more sludge generation. UASB with horizontal gravel filter (UASB + HGF) was among the most land-intensive systems, with moderate costs and O&M requirements, and low energy consumption. However, it fell short of meeting certain environmental criteria. ABR with stabilization ponds (ABR + PONDS) emerged as the most economical, with low energy consumption, but was also among the most land-intensive and failed to achieve adequate effluent quality. Socially, all WWTPs were well accepted for agricultural reuse benefits. In terms of odor perception, UASB + AS and ABR + HGF + VGF exhibit the lowest impact. The Most Appropriate Treatment Technology Index ranked ABR + HGF + VGF and UASB + AS as adequate technologies, while UASB + HGF and ABR + PONDS were poorly adequate. The study recommends a four-dimensional assessment for selecting the most suitable technology, considering the specific context. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2166/wpt.2024.186 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.186 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/46721 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | UWA Publishing | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Water Practice & Technology | |
| dc.source | Fundación PROINPA | |
| dc.subject | Environmental science | |
| dc.subject | Context (archaeology) | |
| dc.subject | Sewage treatment | |
| dc.subject | Reuse | |
| dc.subject | Environmental engineering | |
| dc.subject | Wastewater | |
| dc.subject | Effluent | |
| dc.subject | Agriculture | |
| dc.subject | Irrigation | |
| dc.subject | Energy consumption | |
| dc.title | Integrated assessment of decentralized wastewater treatment plants in a semi-arid region in Bolivia | |
| dc.type | article |