Postmodernismo, postcolonialismo y feminismo: manual para (in)expertos
| dc.contributor.author | Catalina Arreaza | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arlene B. Tickner | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T14:36:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T14:36:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
| dc.description | Citaciones: 19 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This text explores the central arguments of three theoretical perspectives that have analyzed the Englightenrnent project from a critical angle, wiih the goal of identifying their respective contributions to visualizing marginality in social theory. A series of elements are discussed, including the postmodern critique of concepts such as reason and subject; postcolonialism's attempt to ground historical interpretation in silenced, hybrid spaces; and feminist insistence upon the erasure of homogenizing, binary categories. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.7440/colombiaint54.2002.01 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint54.2002.01 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/47453 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad de Los Andes | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Colombia Internacional | |
| dc.source | Universidad de Los Andes | |
| dc.subject | Interpretation (philosophy) | |
| dc.subject | Postmodernism | |
| dc.subject | Postcolonialism (international relations) | |
| dc.subject | Subject (documents) | |
| dc.subject | Feminism | |
| dc.subject | Sociology | |
| dc.subject | Epistemology | |
| dc.subject | Erasure | |
| dc.subject | Philosophy | |
| dc.title | Postmodernismo, postcolonialismo y feminismo: manual para (in)expertos | |
| dc.type | article |