Perspectiva, unidad y alcance de las críticas kantianas a dos interpretaciones de “existe”: Kritik der reinen Vernunft A592-602/B602-630 (I)

dc.contributor.authorV Rafael Simian
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T16:40:09Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T16:40:09Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 2
dc.description.abstractThis essay interprets KrV A592-602/B620-630 not only as a place where Kant intends to refute the ontological argument, but rather as one where he faces a more radical question: how can the human understanding —considered from a logical-general point of view— predicate existence? This first part specifically analyzes the refutation of the ontological argument. The analysis will conclude that a faculty different from the understanding is also required for knowledge of the existent as such.
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/59601
dc.language.isoes
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectPredicate (mathematical logic)
dc.subjectArgument (complex analysis)
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectHumanities
dc.titlePerspectiva, unidad y alcance de las críticas kantianas a dos interpretaciones de “existe”: Kritik der reinen Vernunft A592-602/B602-630 (I)
dc.typearticle

Files