Perspectiva, unidad y alcance de las críticas kantianas a dos interpretaciones de “existe”: Kritik der reinen Vernunft A592-602/B602-630 (I)
| dc.contributor.author | V Rafael Simian | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T16:40:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T16:40:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.description | Citaciones: 2 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This essay interprets KrV A592-602/B620-630 not only as a place where Kant intends to refute the ontological argument, but rather as one where he faces a more radical question: how can the human understanding —considered from a logical-general point of view— predicate existence? This first part specifically analyzes the refutation of the ontological argument. The analysis will conclude that a faculty different from the understanding is also required for knowledge of the existent as such. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/59601 | |
| dc.language.iso | es | |
| dc.source | Universidad de Los Andes | |
| dc.subject | Philosophy | |
| dc.subject | Predicate (mathematical logic) | |
| dc.subject | Argument (complex analysis) | |
| dc.subject | Epistemology | |
| dc.subject | Humanities | |
| dc.title | Perspectiva, unidad y alcance de las críticas kantianas a dos interpretaciones de “existe”: Kritik der reinen Vernunft A592-602/B602-630 (I) | |
| dc.type | article |