MIGRACIONES Y EFECTOS EN LA SUBJETIVIDAD, HOY
Abstract
Los conflictos armados y la pobreza no son los únicos móviles de la migración. En la actualidad, los sujetos escapan de todo aquello que ya no garantiza sus derechos como ciudadanos o que ya no les trae satisfacción. Lo cual, en una sociedad de consumo sucede con frecuencia. Es decir, en los desplazamientos "forzados" ya no solo están en juego condiciones de riesgo extremo, sino también la subjetividad de cada individuo; hay algo del deseo del sujeto que busca crear algo nuevo. El discurso posmoderno de que "todo tiene fecha de expiración" asi como el debilitamiento de la función del padre y debilitamiento de los vínculos hace cada vez más difícil la supervivencia de la familia y la sociedad. Ante esto, ¿cuál es el rol del psicoanalista en las nuevas coordenadas de la época? ¿Es pertinente abogar por el retorno al padre o no? ¿Cuál es el valor de uso que puede dársele al nombre del padre, si tomamos en cuenta su rol esencial en torno al deseo y al goce del sujeto?
Armed conflicts and poverty are not the only motives for migration. At present, subjects tend to escape from everything that no longer guarantees their rights as citizens or that has stopped giving them satisfaction, a common trait in today's consumerist society. That is, not only extreme risky conditions, but also each individual's subjectivity is involved in "forced displacements"; there is a part of the subject's desire that is looking to create something new. The postmodern discourse that states that "everything has an expiration date", as well as the fading of the name of the father and weakening of attachments challenge the survival of the family and society. Given this, what is the role of the psychoanalyst in this new era? Is it relevant to advocate for a return to the father or not? What is the value that can be given to the name of the father considering its essential role in the subject's desire and jouissance?
Armed conflicts and poverty are not the only motives for migration. At present, subjects tend to escape from everything that no longer guarantees their rights as citizens or that has stopped giving them satisfaction, a common trait in today's consumerist society. That is, not only extreme risky conditions, but also each individual's subjectivity is involved in "forced displacements"; there is a part of the subject's desire that is looking to create something new. The postmodern discourse that states that "everything has an expiration date", as well as the fading of the name of the father and weakening of attachments challenge the survival of the family and society. Given this, what is the role of the psychoanalyst in this new era? Is it relevant to advocate for a return to the father or not? What is the value that can be given to the name of the father considering its essential role in the subject's desire and jouissance?
Description
Vol. 11, No. 1