Treatment of New World Mucosal Leishmaniasis: Randomized Comparison of Glucantime®, Liposomal Amphotericin B, and Miltefosine

dc.contributor.authorJaime Alberto Restrepo Soto
dc.contributor.authorPaula Soto
dc.contributor.authorDavid Paz
dc.contributor.authorDaniela Rivero
dc.contributor.authorMartha Sánchez
dc.contributor.authorMaría Clara Arteaga
dc.contributor.authorJonathan Berman
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T20:06:29Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T20:06:29Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractNew World Mucosal Leishmaniasis (ML) is predominantly caused by Leishmania braziliensis. We performed the first randomized trial of the three recommended agents for this disease-intravenous pentavalent antimony (Sb), intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB), oral miltefosine-with 24-month follow-up. Upon study enrollment, disease was scored by the number of sites (oro-nasal-palate, pharynx, larynx) and degree of disease at each site (maximum score = 60.) Our criterion for "cure" was ≥90% diminution in the enrollment score. Cure rates were 20/40 (50%) for Sb, 18/40 (45%) for LAMB, and 23/40 (57%) for miltefosine. Cure was highly dependent on whether the patient was being treated for the first time (39/55 = 71% cure) or undergoing repeat treatment (22/63 = 35% cure). The primary reason for the low cure rate for repeat patients was laryngeal disease at enrollment. For all patients, naïve patients, and repeat patients, the miltefosine cure rate was highest but not statistically so. A curative score at 2-6 months of follow-up had a predictive value of 94% for cure. It is notable that 14 of the 57 treatment failures (25%) were attributable to relapses occurring more than 24 months after therapy completion. Myalgias/arthralgias/general bodily discomfort occurred for LAMB and Sb patients; diarrhea and motion sickness occurred for miltefosine patients; Electrocardiogram abnormalities (occasionally severe) were seen in LAMB and Sb patients. When choosing a treatment of a ML patient, cure rates in part based on disease location and absence/presence of previous treatment, route of administration, tolerability, and cost should be considered. Patients should be followed for ≥2 years.
dc.identifier.doi10.4269/ajtmh.25-0619
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.25-0619
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/80030
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
dc.sourceFundación PROINPA
dc.subjectMiltefosine
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectCure rate
dc.subjectInternal medicine
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectDiarrhea
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectDisease
dc.subjectGastroenterology
dc.subjectLeishmaniasis
dc.titleTreatment of New World Mucosal Leishmaniasis: Randomized Comparison of Glucantime®, Liposomal Amphotericin B, and Miltefosine
dc.typearticle

Files