National construction and popular erasure in Colombia

dc.contributor.authorGregory J. Lobo
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T18:15:59Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T18:15:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractAbstract This article analyses the diachronic symbolic struggle (1810–1991) waged in Colombia’s foundational documents over the legitimation and delegitimation of social relations through the concepts “people” and “nation.” Following the introduction, the method and theory are explained: concept analysis and language-based social ontology. The analysis of the foundational documents follows. These are analysed as extended status function declarations that attempt to legitimate and delegitimate the concepts “people” and “nation”, in order to authorize/deauthorize possible social relations. On the basis of the analysis, the conclusion briefly specifies the discourse of nationism as the ontologisation and wielding of the idea of the nation against internal dissent/opposition, and points up the fundamental importance of symbolic practice in the struggle to change social reality.
dc.identifier.doi10.1075/jlp.19042.lob
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19042.lob
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/69094
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Language and Politics
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectLegitimation
dc.subjectDissent
dc.subjectOpposition (politics)
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectContradiction
dc.subjectThe Symbolic
dc.subjectSocial reality
dc.subjectLinguistics
dc.titleNational construction and popular erasure in Colombia
dc.typearticle

Files