Biodiversity in species, traits, and structure determines carbon stocks and uptake in tropical forests

dc.contributor.authorMasha T. van der Sande
dc.contributor.authorLourens Poorter
dc.contributor.authorLammert Kooistra
dc.contributor.authorPatricia Balvanera
dc.contributor.authorKirsten Thonicke
dc.contributor.authorJill Thompson
dc.contributor.authorE.J.M.M. Arets
dc.contributor.authorNashieli Garcia Alaniz
dc.contributor.authorLaurence Jones
dc.contributor.authorFrancisco Mora
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T13:55:03Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T13:55:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 84
dc.description.abstractAbstract Impacts of climate change require that society urgently develops ways to reduce amounts of carbon in the atmosphere. Tropical forests present an important opportunity, as they take up and store large amounts of carbon. It is often suggested that forests with high biodiversity have large stocks and high rates of carbon uptake. Evidence is, however, scattered across geographic areas and scales, and it remains unclear whether biodiversity is just a co‐benefit or also a requirement for the maintenance of carbon stocks and uptake. Here, we perform a quantitative review of empirical studies that analyzed the relationships between plant biodiversity attributes and carbon stocks and carbon uptake in tropical forests. Our results show that biodiversity attributes related to species, traits or structure significantly affect carbon stocks or uptake in 64% of the evaluated relationships. Average vegetation attributes (community‐mean traits and structural attributes) are more important for carbon stocks, whereas variability in vegetation attributes ( i.e ., taxonomic diversity) is important for both carbon stocks and uptake. Thus, different attributes of biodiversity have complementary effects on carbon stocks and uptake. These biodiversity effects tend to be more often significant in mature forests at broad spatial scales than in disturbed forests at local spatial scales. Biodiversity effects are also more often significant when confounding variables are not included in the analyses, highlighting the importance of performing a comprehensive analysis that adequately accounts for environmental drivers. In summary, biodiversity is not only a co‐benefit, but also a requirement for short‐ and long‐term maintenance of carbon stocks and enhancement of uptake. Climate change policies should therefore include the maintenance of multiple attributes of biodiversity as an essential requirement to achieve long‐term climate change mitigation goals.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/btp.12453
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12453
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/43475
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofBiotropica
dc.sourceWageningen University & Research
dc.subjectBiodiversity
dc.subjectCarbon stock
dc.subjectCarbon sequestration
dc.subjectEnvironmental science
dc.subjectVegetation (pathology)
dc.subjectGlobal biodiversity
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectTropics
dc.subjectCarbon cycle
dc.titleBiodiversity in species, traits, and structure determines carbon stocks and uptake in tropical forests
dc.typearticle

Files