Understanding Fractal Analysis? The Case of Fractal Linguistics

dc.contributor.authorHerbert F. Jelinek
dc.contributor.authorCameron L. Jones
dc.contributor.authorMatthew D. Warfel
dc.contributor.authorCecile Lucas
dc.contributor.authorCecile Depardieu
dc.contributor.authorGaelle Aurel
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:32:25Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 30
dc.description.abstractTerms such as ‘self-similarity’, ‘space filling’, ‘fractal dimension’, and associated concepts have different meanings to different people depending on their background. We examine how methodology in fractal analysis is influenced by diverse definitions of fundamental concepts that lead to difficulties in understanding fundamental issues. The meaning of terms associated with fractal analysis needs to be clarified if this method is to be useful in diverse disciplines. It is our premise that communications that are result focused constitute a danger in perpetuating misconceptions of terms due to the concise nature of the writing and the reliance on references to fill in the procedural and conceptual gaps. Communicating effectively requires a sound understanding of the terminology and a clear and meaningful presentation. We address here communication and the nature of scientific discourse, ‘<i>fractal linguistics</i>’.
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000094189
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000094189
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/47106
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofComplexus
dc.sourceCharles Sturt University
dc.subjectFractal
dc.subjectPremise
dc.subjectTerminology
dc.subjectMeaning (existential)
dc.subjectFractal analysis
dc.subjectLinguistics
dc.subjectNovelty
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectFractal dimension
dc.subjectComputer science
dc.titleUnderstanding Fractal Analysis? The Case of Fractal Linguistics
dc.typearticle

Files