Los juicios de proporcionalidad en la teoría moral y jurídica de la escolástica española aurisecular

dc.contributor.authorAlejandro Miranda Montecinos
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T15:20:37Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T15:20:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 2
dc.description.abstractThis work analyzes the criteria used by the moralists and jurists of Spanish scholasticism (16th and 17th centuries) to carry out proportionality judgments. The author tries to show that the scholastics made important contributions to the development of a theory that, recognizing the incommensurability of fundamental human goods and evils, accepts that it is possible to make comparisons that allow us to speak of greater good (or evil) or lesser good (or evil).
dc.identifier.doi10.15366/bp2021.26.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15366/bp2021.26.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/51815
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherAutonomous University of Madrid
dc.relation.ispartofBajo Palabra
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectHumanities
dc.titleLos juicios de proporcionalidad en la teoría moral y jurídica de la escolástica española aurisecular
dc.typearticle

Files