Asian women’s paths to office: a qualitative comparative analysis approach

dc.contributor.authorIsabel Inguanzo
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:20:09Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:20:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 12
dc.description.abstractThis paper evaluates existing theories regarding women’s participation in top government positions by applying these theories to Asia through a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Thus, this paper aims to identify the conditions necessary and/or sufficient for women to break the political glass ceiling in Asia. Overall, the results show that political parties in democratic or hybrid regimes support different types of female candidates depending on the party’s ideology and political scenario. More specifically, there are three alternative pathways for a party to be successful when selecting a female candidate in Asia. Conditions that were previously necessary in the region, such as family ties to political dynasties or contexts of instability or transition, are no longer necessary. New opportunities in specific socio-political contexts are arising for women who aim to reach the highest office in the country but do not belong to political dynasties.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13569775.2020.1712005
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1712005
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/45913
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.ispartofContemporary Politics
dc.sourceUniversidad Loyola Andalucía
dc.subjectPolitics
dc.subjectIdeology
dc.subjectQualitative comparative analysis
dc.subjectDemocracy
dc.subjectGlass ceiling
dc.subjectQualitative analysis
dc.subjectGovernment (linguistics)
dc.subjectPolitical economy
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.titleAsian women’s paths to office: a qualitative comparative analysis approach
dc.typearticle

Files