Colombian approaches to psychology in the 19th century.

dc.contributor.authorGilberto Oviedo
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T15:07:21Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T15:07:21Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 6
dc.description.abstractColombian intellectuals of the 19th century widely consulted scientific psychology in regard to their political, religious, and educational interests. Colombian independence from Spain (1810) introduced the necessity of transforming the former subjects into illustrious citizens and members of a modern state. After independence, political liberals embraced Bentham's thesis of utilitarianism and the theories of sensibility, with a teaching style based in induction. Conservatives defended the Catholic tradition about the divine origin of the soul and used scholasticism as a model of teaching. A bipartisan coalition, the Regeneration, incorporated the ideas of modern psychology based on the principles of Thomistic thought (Neo-Thomism). The Neo-Thomists considered psychology as a science of the soul and debated physiological explanations of the mind. The conceptual advances of the period have been trivialized in historical accounts of psychology in Colombia, due to the emphasis on the institutionalization processes of the discipline in 1947. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/a0026798
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1037/a0026798
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/50510
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association
dc.relation.ispartofHistory of Psychology
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectPsycINFO
dc.subjectSoul
dc.subjectPolitics
dc.subjectScholasticism
dc.subjectHistory of psychology
dc.subjectIndependence (probability theory)
dc.subjectInstitutionalisation
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.titleColombian approaches to psychology in the 19th century.
dc.typearticle

Files