Can aspects of predatory publishing be applied to some mainstream and grey journals?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSimon Turner
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T20:06:43Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T20:06:43Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractSources of editorial and production practice data for comparing all journals are incomplete and dispersed. More complete quality indicators for <i>all</i> journals that include authors' experiences of publishing need to be openly shared and externally validated. Research funders can influence publishers' behavior by making open access funding contingent upon journals meeting both <i>quality</i> and <i>timeliness</i> indicators for peer review.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08989621.2026.2644380
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2026.2644380
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/80052
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.ispartofAccountability in Research
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectMainstream
dc.subjectPublishing
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectGrey literature
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectResearch ethics
dc.subjectEnvironmental ethics
dc.subjectPublic relations
dc.subjectMedia studies
dc.titleCan aspects of predatory publishing be applied to some mainstream and grey journals?
dc.typearticle

Files

Collections

Artículo Científico Publicado