Usefulness of Serial Blood Sampling and PCR Replicates for Treatment Monitoring of Patients with Chronic Chagas Disease

dc.contributor.authorRudy Parrado
dc.contributor.authorJuan Carlos Ramı́rez
dc.contributor.authorAnabelle de la Barra
dc.contributor.authorCristina Alonso‐Vega
dc.contributor.authorNatalia Juiz
dc.contributor.authorLourdes Ortiz
dc.contributor.authorDaniel Illanes
dc.contributor.authorFaustino Torrico
dc.contributor.authorJoaquím Gascón
dc.contributor.authorFabiana Alves
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:07:33Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:07:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 49
dc.description.abstractThis work evaluated a serial blood sampling procedure to enhance the sensitivity of duplex real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for baseline detection and quantification of parasitic loads and posttreatment identification of failure in the context of clinical trials for treatment of chronic Chagas disease, namely, DNDi-CH-E1224-001 (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01489228) and the MSF-DNDi PCR Sampling Optimization Study (NCT01678599). Patients from Cochabamba (<i>n</i> = 294), Tarija (<i>n</i> = 257), and Aiquile (<i>n</i> = 220) were enrolled. Three serial blood samples were collected at each time point, and qPCR triplicates were tested for each sample. The first two samples were collected during the same day and the third one 7 days later. A patient was considered PCR positive if at least one qPCR replicate was detectable. Cumulative results of multiple samples and qPCR replicates enhanced the proportion of pretreatment sample positivity from 54.8% to 76.2%, 59.5% to 77.8%, and 73.5% to 90.2% in Cochabamba, Tarija, and Aiquile cohorts, respectively. This strategy increased the detection of treatment failure from 72.9% to 91.7%, 77.8% to 88.9%, and 42.9% to 69.1% for E1224 low-, short-, and high-dosage regimens, respectively, and from 4.6% to 15.9% and 9.5% to 32.1% for the benznidazole arm in the DNDi-CH-E1224-001 and MSF-DNDi studies, respectively. The addition of the third blood sample and third qPCR replicate in patients with nondetectable PCR results in the first two samples gave a small, non-statistically significant improvement in qPCR positivity. No change in clinical sensitivity was seen with a blood volume increase from 5 to 10 ml. The monitoring of patients treated with placebo in the DNDi-CH-E1224-001 trial revealed fluctuations in parasitic loads and occasionally nondetectable results. In conclusion, a serial sampling strategy enhanced PCR sensitivity to detecting treatment failure during follow-up and has the potential for improving recruitment capacity in Chagas disease trials, which require an initial positive qPCR result for patient admission.
dc.identifier.doi10.1128/aac.01191-18
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01191-18
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/44689
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Microbiology
dc.relation.ispartofAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
dc.sourceUniversity of San Simón
dc.subjectChagas disease
dc.subjectBlood sampling
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectContext (archaeology)
dc.subjectSampling (signal processing)
dc.subjectReal-time polymerase chain reaction
dc.subjectDisease monitoring
dc.subjectClinical trial
dc.subjectInternal medicine
dc.subjectNifurtimox
dc.titleUsefulness of Serial Blood Sampling and PCR Replicates for Treatment Monitoring of Patients with Chronic Chagas Disease
dc.typearticle

Files