213 - Validity of AI Cephalometric Tracing Compared With Manual Digital Methods: A Pilot Study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCristóbal Gajardo G
dc.contributor.authorMartina Appelt
dc.contributor.authorCatalina Anuch
dc.contributor.authorTania Rojas
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T19:52:06Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T19:52:06Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.07.217
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.07.217
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/78599
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectIntraclass correlation
dc.subjectCephalometric analysis
dc.subjectTracing
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectCephalometry
dc.subjectSoftware
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectPerimeter
dc.subjectLandmark
dc.subjectReproducibility
dc.title213 - Validity of AI Cephalometric Tracing Compared With Manual Digital Methods: A Pilot Study
dc.typearticle

Files

Collections

Artículo Científico Publicado