The gender gap in the care economy is larger in highly developed countries: Sociocultural explanations for paradoxical findings.

dc.contributor.authorKatharina Block
dc.contributor.authorMaria I. T. Olsson
dc.contributor.authorSanne Van Grootel
dc.contributor.authorCarolin Schuster
dc.contributor.authorLoes Meeussen
dc.contributor.authorColette van Laar
dc.contributor.authorSarah E. Martiny
dc.contributor.authorAlyssa Croft
dc.contributor.authorMolly Shuyi Sun
dc.contributor.authorS. Wee
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T19:47:04Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T19:47:04Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractDespite the growing demand for care economy employees (e.g., nurses, teachers, and social workers), men remain underrepresented in these careers. While economically developed countries support more equal rights for women and men, their labor markets are highly gender segregated (Charles, 1992, 2003). We conducted a focused investigation of this paradoxical pattern in the care economy, testing whether gender gaps in care economy career interest are larger in more economically developed countries and, if so, what psychological and cultural factors underlie these patterns. We examined these questions with labor data from 70 countries (Study 1) and a preregistered study of career interests among 19,240 university students from 49 countries (Study 2). Although more economically developed countries tend to promote greater gender equality, our results reveal that the gender gap in care economy representation (Study 1) and interest (Study 2) is especially large in such countries. We did not observe parallel patterns for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics representation or interest. Results from Study 2 supported an integrated theoretical account of this development paradox in care economy interest: Cross-national variation in the gender gap in care economy interest was predicted by country-level variation in economic development and individualism/collectivism but not by self-expression values or country-level gender equality, countering prior (controversial) claims of a <i>gender equality paradox</i>. Furthermore, larger gender gaps in communal values (e.g., men's lower valuing of helping and caring for others) were a proximal predictor of larger gender gaps in care economy interest in highly economically developed countries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/amp0001512
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001512
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/78097
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Psychologist
dc.sourceUniversity of Amsterdam
dc.subjectSociocultural evolution
dc.subjectGender gap
dc.subjectVariation (astronomy)
dc.subjectRepresentation (politics)
dc.subjectDeveloping country
dc.subjectDeveloped country
dc.subjectDemographic economics
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subjectGender role
dc.subjectSocioeconomic status
dc.titleThe gender gap in the care economy is larger in highly developed countries: Sociocultural explanations for paradoxical findings.
dc.typearticle

Files