Réplica al artículo de Alejandro Secades Gómez: “¿Lógica trivalente aimara? Análisis de una teoría sobre razonamiento no occidental”

dc.contributor.authorIván Guzmán de Rojas
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T16:51:43Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T16:51:43Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractReply to Alejandro Secades Gomez's article (RIA, 6, 2013: 1-28) in which my work published in 1982 by the IDRC is analyzed and findings are questioned, while reflecting on this type of studies. Here I refute the disqualification he makes of the data sources used in the logic-linguistic analysis of my work as well as some of the assertions that the author throws on its main content.Keywords: Aymara language and culture, cognitive and linguistic anthropology, intercultural argumentation, linguistic and cultural relativism, reasoning, trivalent logic, abstract algebra.
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistas.uned.es/index.php/RIA/article/view/14988/13289
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/60749
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherAutonomous University of Madrid
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Iberoamericana de Argumentación
dc.sourceAcademia Nacional de Ciencias de Bolivia
dc.subjectArgumentation theory
dc.subjectRelativism
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectLinguistics
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectHumanities
dc.titleRéplica al artículo de Alejandro Secades Gómez: “¿Lógica trivalente aimara? Análisis de una teoría sobre razonamiento no occidental”
dc.typearticle

Files