Prognostic scale for death in critically ill cancer patients due to neurological complications

dc.contributor.authorAriel Sosa Remón
dc.contributor.authorFreddy Ednildon Bautista-Vanegas
dc.contributor.authorJosé Bernardo Antezana-Muñoz
dc.contributor.authorOsman Arteaga Iriarte
dc.contributor.authorYudiel Pérez-Yero
dc.contributor.authorArian Jesús Cuba Naranjo
dc.contributor.authorMiguel Emilio García Rodríguez
dc.contributor.authorJhossmar Cristians Auza-Santiváñez
dc.contributor.authorAna Esperanza Jeréz Álvarez
dc.contributor.authorJ. Triana
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T19:41:51Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T19:41:51Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The scales used to predict death in cancer patients are scarce and have not been adequately validated in populations with neurological complications. Objective: To design a prognostic scale for death in critically ill cancer patients due to neurological complications. Method: An observational, prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 to 2024 in the Oncology Intensive Care Unit of the Institute of Oncology and Radiobiology in Havana, Cuba. The study population consisted of 265 patients. Clinical, oncological, laboratory, and life support variables were studied. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the variables with the best prognostic power for the model. The final variable was mortality in the Intensive Care Unit. Results: The final model consisted of the following variables: ECOG III (OR: 3.62; 95% CI: 1.05 - 12.46; p= 0.041), absence of pupillary reflex (OR: 9.35; 95% CI: 2.24 - 38.99; p= 0.002), intracranial hypertension (OR: 17.91; 95% CI: 3.02 - 105.91; p= 0.001), hyperglycemia (OR: 5.85; 95% CI: 2.07 - 16.49; p= 0.001), hypoxemia (OR: 19.09; 95% CI: 2.91 - 61.67; p= 0.000) and artificial mechanical ventilation (OR: 9.59; 95% CI: 2.59 – 35.51; p = 0.001).Conclusions: The prognostic score classified mortality into 3 risk groups: low (0 to 2 points), moderate (3 to 6 points), and high (7 to 13 points). Mortality was higher in patients with higher scores. Internal validation showed excellent calibration and discrimination.
dc.identifier.doi10.56294/hl2025598
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.56294/hl2025598
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/77582
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Leadership and Quality of Life
dc.sourceInstituto de Oncología y Radiobiología
dc.subjectCritically ill
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectIntensive care medicine
dc.subjectCancer
dc.subjectScale (ratio)
dc.titlePrognostic scale for death in critically ill cancer patients due to neurological complications
dc.typearticle

Files