Framing the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions

dc.contributor.authorNathalie Pettorelli
dc.contributor.authorMartin Wegmann
dc.contributor.authorAndrew K. Skidmore
dc.contributor.authorC.A. Mücher
dc.contributor.authorTerence P. Dawson
dc.contributor.authorMiguel Fernández
dc.contributor.authorRichard Lucas
dc.contributor.authorMichael E. Schaepman
dc.contributor.authorTiejun Wang
dc.contributor.authorBrian P. O’Connor
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T13:50:51Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T13:50:51Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 312
dc.description.abstractAbstract Although satellite‐based variables have for long been expected to be key components to a unified and global biodiversity monitoring strategy, a definitive and agreed list of these variables still remains elusive. The growth of interest in biodiversity variables observable from space has been partly underpinned by the development of the essential biodiversity variable ( EBV ) framework by the Group on Earth Observations – Biodiversity Observation Network, which itself was guided by the process of identifying essential climate variables. This contribution aims to advance the development of a global biodiversity monitoring strategy by updating the previously published definition of EBV , providing a definition of satellite remote sensing (SRS) EBV s and introducing a set of principles that are believed to be necessary if ecologists and space agencies are to agree on a list of EBV s that can be routinely monitored from space. Progress toward the identification of SRS‐ EBV s will require a clear understanding of what makes a biodiversity variable essential, as well as agreement on who the users of the SRS‐ EBV s are. Technological and algorithmic developments are rapidly expanding the set of opportunities for SRS in monitoring biodiversity, and so the list of SRS‐ EBV s is likely to evolve over time. This means that a clear and common platform for data providers, ecologists, environmental managers, policy makers and remote sensing experts to interact and share ideas needs to be identified to support long‐term coordinated actions.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/rse2.15
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.15
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/43065
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
dc.sourceZoological Society of London
dc.subjectBiodiversity
dc.subjectFraming (construction)
dc.subjectIdentification (biology)
dc.subjectEnvironmental resource management
dc.subjectVariable (mathematics)
dc.subjectComputer science
dc.subjectSet (abstract data type)
dc.subjectRemote sensing
dc.titleFraming the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions
dc.typearticle

Files