Treatment of Bolivian Leishmania braziliensis Cutaneous and Mucosal Leishmaniasis

dc.contributor.authorJaime Soto
dc.contributor.authorPatrícia Gutiérrez
dc.contributor.authorPaula Soto
dc.contributor.authorDavid Paz
dc.contributor.authorEduardo Cayhuara
dc.contributor.authorCarmen Molina
dc.contributor.authorMia Sánchez
dc.contributor.authorJonathan Berman
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T15:14:23Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T15:14:23Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 4
dc.description.abstractAlthough infection with Leishmania braziliensis is perhaps the key reason to treat New World cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and mucosal leishmaniasis (ML), the total literature contains relatively few reported cases. With the aim of supplementing the meager clinical information available, we searched the records of Jorochito (Dermatology) Hospital, Bolivia, for the years 1999-2020 and identified treatment records for 1,696 naive CL patients and 355 naive ML patients. Because follow-up was poor for this real-world treatment experience in the developing world, only 255 CL patients (15%) and 114 ML patients (32%) attended follow-up at Hospital. We therefore engaged in an Active Search for "lost" patients, located a further 542 CL patients (32%) and 142 ML patients (44%), thus eventually accomplished follow up on 697 CL patients (41%) and 256 ML patients (72%). Granular adverse event data derived from hospital records is listed for the 902 CL and 86 ML patients administered Glucantime intramuscularly, the 401 CL and 202 ML patients administered Glucantime intravenously, and the 163 CL and 89 ML patients administered miltefosine orally. Efficacy was obtained from hospital records for patients seen at hospital and from patient recall communicated by telephone for the patients found in the Active Search. The overall CL cure rate was 508 of 697 CL patients (73%) with follow-up: intramuscular Glucantime-196/293 (67%); intravenous Glucantime-90/126 (71%); intralesional Glucantime-34/54 (63%); oral miltefosine-52/69 (75%). The overall ML cure rate was 161 of 256 ML patients (63%) with follow-up: intramuscular Glucantime-26/48 (54%); intravenous Glucantime-66/104 (63%); intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate-19/35 (54%); oral miltefosine-50/71 (70%). We offer this extensive adverse event and efficacy experience as useful guides for clinicians presented with a L. braziliensis infection. The cure rates also illustrate the quandary of New World CL and ML chemotherapy: sufficiently high to be useful but nevertheless needing augmentation with new agents.
dc.identifier.doi10.4269/ajtmh.21-0928
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.21-0928
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/51201
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
dc.sourceFundación PROINPA
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectMiltefosine
dc.subjectCutaneous leishmaniasis
dc.subjectLeishmaniasis
dc.subjectAdverse effect
dc.subjectInternal medicine
dc.subjectIntramuscular injection
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.subjectLeishmania braziliensis
dc.subjectGastroenterology
dc.titleTreatment of Bolivian Leishmania braziliensis Cutaneous and Mucosal Leishmaniasis
dc.typearticle

Files