Monosymptomatic primary enuresis: differences between patients responding or not responding to oral desmopressin

dc.contributor.authorRoberto Rendón Medel
dc.contributor.authorStella M. Dieguez
dc.contributor.authorM. Brindo
dc.contributor.authorSullivan A. Ayuso
dc.contributor.authorC.A. Cánepa
dc.contributor.authorADOLFO RUARTE
dc.contributor.authorMiguel Luis Podestá
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:42:50Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:42:50Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 47
dc.description.abstractPolyuria occurred in all patients with MPE, independently of the response to desmopressin. Responders had the lowest AVP values over the 24 h; the morning AVP levels differentiated normal subjects from enuretic patients and responders from non-responders. In patients with MPE, clinically undetected bladder instability was unrelated to the results of treatment and there were no urodynamic changes during desmopressin treatment. The differences between enuretic patients suggested a different aetiology of MPE, probably related to an increase in PGE2 concentration and an antagonistic mechanism of action of AVP or desmopressin.
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00007.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00007.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/48115
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Urology
dc.sourceHospital General de Niños Ricardo Gutierrez
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectDesmopressin
dc.subjectEnuresis
dc.subjectHumanities
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.titleMonosymptomatic primary enuresis: differences between patients responding or not responding to oral desmopressin
dc.typearticle

Files