Tramadol effects on physical performance and sustained attention during a 20-min indoor cycling time-trial: A randomised controlled trial
| dc.contributor.author | Darías Holgado | |
| dc.contributor.author | Thomas Zandonai | |
| dc.contributor.author | Míkel Zabala | |
| dc.contributor.author | James Hopker | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pandelis Perakakis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Antonio Luque‐Casado | |
| dc.contributor.author | Luís F. Ciria | |
| dc.contributor.author | Eduardo Guerra‐Hernández | |
| dc.contributor.author | Daniel Sanabria | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T20:54:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T20:54:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To investigate the effect of tramadol on performance during a 20-min cycling time-trial (Exper- iment 1), and to test whether sustained attention would be impaired during cycling after tramadol intake (Experiment 2). Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Methods: In Experiment 1, participants completed a cycling time-trial, 120-min after they ingested either tramadol or placebo. In Experiment 2, participants performed a visual oddball task during the time-trial. Electroencephalography measures (EEG) were recorded throughout the session. Results: In Experiment 1, average time-trial power output was higher in the tramadol vs. placebo condition (tramadol: 220 W vs. placebo: 209 W; p < 0.01). In Experiment 2, no differences between conditions were observed in the average power output (tramadol: 234 W vs. placebo: 230 W; p > 0.05). No behavioural differences were found between conditions in the oddball task. Crucially, the time frequency analysis in Experiment 2 revealed an overall lower target-locked power in the beta-band (p < 0.01), and higher alpha suppression (p < 0.01) in the tramadol vs. placebo condition. At baseline, EEG power spectrum was higher under tramadol than under placebo in Experiment 1 while the reverse was true for Experiment 2. Conclusions: Tramadol improved cycling power output in Experiment 1, but not in Experiment 2, which may be due to the simultaneous performance of a cognitive task. Interestingly enough, the EEG data in Experiment 2 pointed to an impact of tramadol on stimulus processing related to sustained attention. Trial registration: EudraCT number: 2015-005056-96. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5281/zenodo.1308614 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1308614 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/84760 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | European Organization for Nuclear Research | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) | |
| dc.source | Universidad de Granada | |
| dc.subject | Time trial | |
| dc.subject | Cycling | |
| dc.subject | Tramadol | |
| dc.subject | Randomized controlled trial | |
| dc.subject | Physical medicine and rehabilitation | |
| dc.subject | Physical therapy | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Environmental science | |
| dc.title | Tramadol effects on physical performance and sustained attention during a 20-min indoor cycling time-trial: A randomised controlled trial | |
| dc.type | dataset |