Effect of tree density on competition between Leucaena leucocephala and Chloris gayana using a Nelder Wheel trial. II. Belowground interactions

dc.contributor.authorAnibal Nahuel Alejandro Pachas
dc.contributor.authorH. M. Shelton
dc.contributor.authorChristopher J. Lambrides
dc.contributor.authorScott A. Dalzell
dc.contributor.authorG. J. Murtagh
dc.contributor.authorCraig Hardner
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:36:27Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:36:27Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 18
dc.description.abstractLeucaena (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit subsp. glabrata (Rose) Zarate) in combination with grass pasture is one of the most persistent, productive and sustainable grazing systems used in Queensland, Australia. Nevertheless, a better understanding of the competitive interactions that determine the proportions of leucaena and grass components is needed to optimise the design and management of the hedgerow pasture system. In a water-limited environment, belowground interactions between species are especially influential. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of leucaena plant density and Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana Kunth) competition on root distribution, evapotranspiration, patterns of soil-water use and the resulting water-use efficiency (WUE) of the leucaena and grass components. Results showed that although leucaena had deeper roots than Rhodes grass, the majority of fine roots of both leucaena and Rhodes grass were in the upper 1.5 m of the soil profile suggesting a high level of competition for water resources. A major factor favouring Rhodes grass was that its root abundance was 8–10 times greater than leucaena, allowing it to compete more effectively for water resources and limit the lateral spread of leucaena roots. Higher cumulative evapotranspiration values were recorded from leucaena grown with Rhodes grass than from leucaena grown in absence of grass. However, this difference was negligible at the highest leucaena density owing to the reduced yield of grass caused by shading and increased water uptake of leucaena. The findings of this study also confirmed the hypothesis that at low tree densities, leucaena–grass pasture will have higher WUE (13.8 kg DM mm–1) than sole leucaena, but this difference was reduced with increments of leucaena density. Highest WUE (65.9 kg DM mm–1) occurred at highest leucaena density with or without grass.
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/cp18040
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1071/cp18040
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/47495
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofCrop and Pasture Science
dc.sourceUniversity of Queensland
dc.subjectLeucaena
dc.subjectChloris gayana
dc.subjectLeucaena leucocephala
dc.subjectBiology
dc.subjectPasture
dc.subjectAgronomy
dc.subjectCompetition (biology)
dc.subjectBotany
dc.titleEffect of tree density on competition between Leucaena leucocephala and Chloris gayana using a Nelder Wheel trial. II. Belowground interactions
dc.typearticle

Files