Twenty-five species of frogs in a liter of water: eDNA survey for exploring tropical frog diversity

dc.contributor.authorMiklós Bálint
dc.contributor.authorCarsten Nowak
dc.contributor.authorOrsolya Márton
dc.contributor.authorSteffen U. Pauls
dc.contributor.authorClaudia Wittwer
dc.contributor.authorJosé Luis Aramayo
dc.contributor.authorArne Schulze
dc.contributor.authorThierry Chambert
dc.contributor.authorBerardino Cocchiararo
dc.contributor.authorMartin Jansen
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T20:43:06Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T20:43:06Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 6
dc.description.abstractBiodiversity is declining at unprecedented rates, with species extinctions being an important component of this process. Currently it is almost impossible to evaluate this loss since biodiversity data is lacking even for emblematic species. Recent advances in eDNA marker gene studies promise to deliver the necessary data, but these approaches have almost never been evaluated in the tropics. Here we evaluate whether 1) eDNA metabarcoding may reliably generate frog faunistic data in species-rich tropical areas, 2) the ecological signal in eDNA data is compatible with data from visual and audio encounter survey (VAES), and 3) eDNA data represent a financially viable solution to biodiversity data acquisition. We applied eDNA metabarcoding to investigate frog species occurrence in five ponds in the Chiquitano dry forest region in Bolivia and compared our data with a simultaneous VAES. We find that taxon lists generated with eDNA and VAES correspond closely, and most deviations are attributable to different species' life histories. The ecological signal in eDNA closely matches the signal from VAES. We find that the cost efficiency of eDNA surveys is mostly influenced by the richness of local fauna and the number of surveyed sites: VAES may be less costly in low-diversity regions, but eDNA quickly becomes more cost-efficient in high-diversity regions, particularly with many sites. The results underline that eDNA is suitable for large-scale biodiversity surveys in high-diversity areas if precautions in data generation and interpretation are taken and this projects spatially extensive standardized biodiversity surveys in the close future.
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/83662
dc.language.isoen
dc.sourceSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M
dc.subjectBiodiversity
dc.subjectEnvironmental DNA
dc.subjectSpecies richness
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectTaxon
dc.subjectBiology
dc.subjectGlobal biodiversity
dc.subjectFauna
dc.subjectSpecies diversity
dc.subjectGeography
dc.titleTwenty-five species of frogs in a liter of water: eDNA survey for exploring tropical frog diversity
dc.typepreprint

Files