Escolástica renacentista y recepción de la doctrina aristotélica sobre lo justo natural: Philipp Melanchthon y Francisco Suárez

dc.contributor.authorAlfonso Herreros Besa
dc.contributor.authorSebastián Contreras
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T18:27:12Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T18:27:12Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe scholastic interpretation of Aristotle focuses on the idea of the natural law to justify the pre-political foundations of social reality. Now, there is no single great scholastic synthesis, nor is there a single Aristotelianism that is common to all the scholastic commentators of Ethica ? 7. Thus, Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560), the so-called præceptor Germaniæ, depicts a different understanding of Aristotle than the Jesuit Francisco Suárez (1548-1617), because, as we will show, Suárez understands the just by nature as the right of practical reason, whereas Melanchthon identifies it with the theoretical knowledge of the moral principles implanted by God in man.
dc.identifier.doi10.15366/bp2021.26.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15366/bp2021.26.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/70200
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherAutonomous University of Madrid
dc.relation.ispartofBajo Palabra
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectHumanities
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.titleEscolástica renacentista y recepción de la doctrina aristotélica sobre lo justo natural: Philipp Melanchthon y Francisco Suárez
dc.typearticle

Files