Identifying the current and future status of freshwater connectivity corridors in the Amazon Basin

dc.contributor.authorBernardo Caldas
dc.contributor.authorMichele Thieme
dc.contributor.authorNatalie Shahbol
dc.contributor.authorMaria Eduarda Moraes Sarmento Coelho
dc.contributor.authorGuenther Grill
dc.contributor.authorPaul A. Van Damme
dc.contributor.authorRicardo Aranha
dc.contributor.authorCarlos Cañas
dc.contributor.authorCamila Kurzmann Fagundes
dc.contributor.authorNicole Franco‐León
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T13:58:08Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T13:58:08Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 35
dc.description.abstractAbstract The Amazon Basin features a vast network of healthy, free‐flowing rivers, which provides habitat for the most biodiverse freshwater fauna of any basin globally. However, existing and future infrastructure developments, including dams, threaten its integrity by diminishing river connectivity, altering flows, or changing sediment regimes, which can impact freshwater species. In this study, we assess critical rivers that need to be maintained as freshwater connectivity corridors (FCCs) for selective freshwater species—long‐distance migratory fishes and turtles (both with migrations >500 km) and river dolphins. We define FCCs as river stretches of uninterrupted river connectivity that provide important riverine and floodplain habitat for long‐distance migratory and other species and that maintain associated ecosystem functions. We assessed more than 340,000 km of river, beginning with an assessment of the connectivity status of all rivers and then combining river status with models of occurrence of key species to map where FCCs occur and how they could be affected under a scenario of proposed dams. We identified that in 2019, 16 of 26 very long (>1000 km) rivers are free‐flowing but only 9 would remain free‐flowing if all proposed dams are built. Among long and very long rivers (>500 km), 93 are considered FCCs. Under the future scenario, one‐fifth (18) of these long and very long FCCs—those that are of critical importance for long‐distance migrants and dolphins—would lose their FCC status, including the Amazon, the Negro, Marañón, Napo, Ucayali, Preto do Igapó Açu, Beni, and Uraricoera rivers. To avoid impacts of poorly sited infrastructure, we advocate for energy and water resources planning at the basin scale that evaluates alternative development options and limits development that will impact on FCCs. The results also highlight where corridors could be designated as protected from future fragmentation.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/csp2.12853
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12853
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/43775
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Conservation Biology
dc.relation.ispartofConservation Science and Practice
dc.sourceUniversidade de Brasília
dc.subjectHabitat
dc.subjectAmazon rainforest
dc.subjectDrainage basin
dc.subjectGeography
dc.subjectFloodplain
dc.subjectBiodiversity
dc.subjectFreshwater ecosystem
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectEcosystem
dc.subjectEnvironmental science
dc.titleIdentifying the current and future status of freshwater connectivity corridors in the Amazon Basin
dc.typearticle

Files