Subordinación vs. autonomía

dc.contributor.authorPablo Martínez
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T18:14:03Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T18:14:03Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstractOn this paper, the different Processes of Candidate Appointment (PCA) to the  House of Representatives used in the District of Canelones in the 1999 and 2004 election are described and classified, which is entirely novel, as this kind of study was never done in Uruguay before. The study inquires into the hypothesis which states that PCA affect legislative behaviour because candidates elected in autonomous PCA tend to have more legislative initiatives –both, individual and collective- and simultaneously, the proportion of issues related to their district they deal with, is higher than the undertaken by candidates elected in a centralized PCA.
dc.identifier.urihttp://rucp.cienciassociales.edu.uy/index.php/rucp/article/download/251/192
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/68902
dc.language.isoes
dc.publisherUniversidad de la República
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política
dc.sourceUniversidad de la República de Uruguay
dc.subjectLegislature
dc.subjectAffect (linguistics)
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectHouse of Representatives
dc.subjectPublic administration
dc.subjectPrincipal (computer security)
dc.titleSubordinación vs. autonomía
dc.typearticle

Files