Findings From the Great British and Northern Ireland Botulinum Toxin Survey: Treatment Outcomes, Patient Experience, and Regulations From a Cross-Sectional Survey
| dc.contributor.author | Lee Smith | |
| dc.contributor.author | José Francisco López‐Gil | |
| dc.contributor.author | Julia Gawronska | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yvonne Barnett | |
| dc.contributor.author | Laurie Butler | |
| dc.contributor.author | Helen Keyes | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dong Keon Yon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Damiano Pizzol | |
| dc.contributor.author | Masoud Rahmati | |
| dc.contributor.author | Roshan Ravindran | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T14:29:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T14:29:24Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description | Citaciones: 1 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Given rising demand for botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatments and limited data on safety, ethics, and regulation, a national survey explored experiences with cosmetic BoNT in the United Kingdom. Objectives To conduct a national observational survey with the aim to capture real-world experiences of cosmetic BoNT in the United Kingdom. Methods A cross-sectional online survey gathered data on experiences with cosmetic BoNT injections across the United Kingdom. Participation was open to adults (≥18 years) who had received cosmetic BoNT treatment. Results A total of 919 participants completed the survey and were predominantly female, white, and had a high household income. Commonly reported acute complications were bruising/swelling (26.1%), and headache (24.7%). Commonly reported long-term complications were BoNT resistance (2.9%), social withdrawal (2.7%), nerve damage (2.5%), and dry eyes/vision problems (2.5%). In total, 66% stated their treatment was administered by a prescriber, 28% said it was not. Among those treated by a non-prescriber, 40% reported that a prescriber was present during the consultation, 42% said no prescriber was present, and 17% were unsure. Surprisingly, a few had not signed a consent form (8%), 11% were not informed of treatment risks, and 18% were not told how to respond to complications. A large majority expressed support for enhanced oversight, with 57.8% favoring significantly stricter regulation, and 31.3% somewhat stricter regulation. Conclusions Cosmetic BoNT can offer high satisfaction and a favorable safety profile when administered appropriately. However, findings highlight key vulnerabilities: inconsistent practitioner qualifications, gaps in informed consent, insufficient complication support, and weak regulation. Level of Evidence:3 (Therapeutic) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/asjof/ojaf115 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf115 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/46813 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum | |
| dc.source | Anglia Ruskin University | |
| dc.subject | Northern ireland | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Botulism | |
| dc.subject | Botulinum toxin | |
| dc.subject | Family medicine | |
| dc.subject | Environmental health | |
| dc.title | Findings From the Great British and Northern Ireland Botulinum Toxin Survey: Treatment Outcomes, Patient Experience, and Regulations From a Cross-Sectional Survey | |
| dc.type | article |