La securitización de la crisis colombiana: bases conceptuales y tendencias generales

dc.contributor.authorArlene B. Tickner
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T14:44:57Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T14:44:57Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.descriptionCitaciones: 20
dc.description.abstractThis article argues that perceptions of insecurity and threat produced by Colombia in neighboring countries are not the result of the objective consequences of the regionalization of the Colombian crisis, but rather, depend largely upon internal political dynamics in each country and the ways in which their representatives articulate specific issues as security problems. Following a general conceptual discussion of security and securitization, the author explores the primary practices of securitization that have been employed by Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela. This examination allows the article to conclude that the Colombian crisis and U.S. military policy in the region are two factors that currently determine the security dynamics in this zone.
dc.identifier.doi10.7440/colombiaint60.2004.01
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint60.2004.01
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/48319
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.relation.ispartofColombia Internacional
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectHumanities
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.titleLa securitización de la crisis colombiana: bases conceptuales y tendencias generales
dc.typearticle

Files