Estado, democracia y violencia en América Latina

dc.contributor.authorMauricio Uribe López
dc.coverage.spatialBolivia
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-22T17:09:26Z
dc.date.available2026-03-22T17:09:26Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractDue to the high levels of violence in Latin America, the security policy debate has hesitated between two approaches: the Zero Tolerance approach and the preventive social policy; it is a false dilemma. The effectiveness of both the ’nightstick’ and the ’carrot’ depends on the quality of democracy. If the State actor’s action responds to particularistic logics, and it is not able to guarantee that the rule of law reaches the entire territory, security policies could become an additional source of insecurity. The quality of democracy as a regime and as the rule of law should be considered prior to uncritically copying foreign security policies. It is wise to do so while designing incentives systems for the security sector.
dc.identifier.doi10.7440/colombiaint71.2010.09
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint71.2010.09
dc.identifier.urihttps://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/62503
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.relation.ispartofColombia Internacional
dc.sourceUniversidad de Los Andes
dc.subjectIncentive
dc.subjectDemocracy
dc.subjectLatin Americans
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectRule of law
dc.subjectState (computer science)
dc.subjectDilemma
dc.subjectQuality (philosophy)
dc.subjectPolitical economy
dc.subjectLaw and economics
dc.titleEstado, democracia y violencia en América Latina
dc.typearticle

Files