La regulación de Petición de alimentos de oficio en procesos judiciales de Filiación de Paternidad Extramatrimonial en Perú
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Tribunal
Abstract
El objetivo fue analizar la efectividad que el juez de oficio al asignar una pensión de alimentos de forma accesoria en el proceso de filiación extramatrimonial. El enfoque cualitativo reflexivo se basó en un análisis temático fenomenológico mediante jurisprudencia nacional. Se observa que, en el sistema judicial peruano, el juez no tiene la facultad de otorgar de oficio una pensión alimenticia si no se solicita expresamente en la demanda. La normativa vigente establece que la solicitud de pensión debe ser planteada por la parte interesada ante el juzgado, conforme a la Ley 28457 y su modificación por la Ley 30628. La jurisprudencia nacional respalda esta interpretación, indicando que la solicitud de pensión alimenticia debe ser presentada accesoriamente por la parte demandante y no de manera automática por el juez. Se concluye que es esencial que el juez pueda asignar una pensión alimenticia de oficio en un proceso de filiación extramatrimonial, ya que esta medida garantiza la protección del menor, en línea con los principios de economía procesal, celeridad y unidad procesal.
The objective was to analyze the effectiveness of the ex officio judge in assigning an accessory alimony in the process of extramarital affiliation. The reflective qualitative approach was based on a phenomenological thematic analysis using national jurisprudence. It is noted that, in the Peruvian judicial system, the judge does not have the power to grant alimony ex officio if it is not expressly requested in the lawsuit. The current regulations establish that the request for alimony must be presented by the interested party before the court, in accordance with Law 28457 and its modification by Law 30628. National jurisprudence supports this interpretation, indicating that the application for alimony must be presented incidentally by the plaintiff and not automatically by the judge. It is concluded that it is essential that the judge can assign alimony ex officio in a process of extramarital affiliation, since this measure guarantees the protection of the minor, in line with the principles of procedural economy, speed and procedural unity.
The objective was to analyze the effectiveness of the ex officio judge in assigning an accessory alimony in the process of extramarital affiliation. The reflective qualitative approach was based on a phenomenological thematic analysis using national jurisprudence. It is noted that, in the Peruvian judicial system, the judge does not have the power to grant alimony ex officio if it is not expressly requested in the lawsuit. The current regulations establish that the request for alimony must be presented by the interested party before the court, in accordance with Law 28457 and its modification by Law 30628. National jurisprudence supports this interpretation, indicating that the application for alimony must be presented incidentally by the plaintiff and not automatically by the judge. It is concluded that it is essential that the judge can assign alimony ex officio in a process of extramarital affiliation, since this measure guarantees the protection of the minor, in line with the principles of procedural economy, speed and procedural unity.
Description
Vol. 5, No. 10