Distribución de recursos del Estado entre los gobiernos, conforme con la Constitución y los derechos humanos en Bolivia
Abstract
Los recursos del Estado en Bolivia actualmente se distribuyen entre los gobiernos por cantidad poblacional, según los datos del Censo de Población y Vivienda. No obstante, esa forma es incompatible con la doctrina de los derechos humanos -dado que no ayuda en la igualdad social al concentrar los recursos en las zonas donde hay mayor desarrollo- y es inconstitucional -ya que la Constitución boliviana manda a que la distribución sea por necesidades de desarrollo, por carga de competencias asignadas y por capacidad de recaudación. El primer criterio es para la inversión, con base en los datos situacionales del Censo y otros datos estadísticos y; el segundo, sobre todo, para el funcionamiento institucional con base en un análisis de costeo competencial.
State resources in Bolivia are currently distributed among governments based on population, according to data from the Population and Housing Census. However, this approach is incompatible with human rights doctrine -given it does not contribute to social equality by concentrating resources in areas with greater development- and it is also unconstitutional -given that the bolivian Constitution mandates distribution based on development needs, assigned responsibilities, and revenue collection capacity. The first criterion is primarily for investment and is based on situational data from the Census and other statistical data, while the second is primarily for institutional functioning, based on a competency based costing analysis.
State resources in Bolivia are currently distributed among governments based on population, according to data from the Population and Housing Census. However, this approach is incompatible with human rights doctrine -given it does not contribute to social equality by concentrating resources in areas with greater development- and it is also unconstitutional -given that the bolivian Constitution mandates distribution based on development needs, assigned responsibilities, and revenue collection capacity. The first criterion is primarily for investment and is based on situational data from the Census and other statistical data, while the second is primarily for institutional functioning, based on a competency based costing analysis.
Description
Vol. 14, No. 22