Estructura teórica de transparencia como estrategia para la auditoría gubernamental de contralorías territoriales en América Latina
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Impulso
Abstract
Esta investigación tiene como objetivo desarrollar un marco teórico integral cuatridimensional que articula la transparencia como estrategia sistémica para fortalecer la auditoría gubernamental territorial en América Latina. El estudio adopta un diseño de revisión teórico-conceptual sistemática basado en la síntesis crítica de evidencia empírica convergente de Ecuador, Colombia, Perú, Brasil y Chile durante 2004-2025. La metodología empleó 86 fuentes especializadas mediante triangulación múltiple y análisis documental sistemático. El marco propone cuatro dimensiones: transparencia activa territorial, reactiva territorial, participativa territorial y técnica territorial, cada una con componentes operativos específicos e indicadores de medición validados empíricamente. Los marcos institucionales evidencian características diferenciadas, destacando la innovación constitucional ecuatoriana de 2008, el liderazgo tecnológico brasileño con herramientas como ALICE, las experiencias peruanas en modernización tecnológica, los desarrollos colombianos de integración sistémica y los análisis chilenos de mejora continua. El modelo establece seis principios rectores: territorialidad diferenciada, integralidad sistémica, mejora contínua basada en evidencia, participación multinivel, innovación tecnológica responsable y supremacía constitucional. Esta investigación trasciende la sistematización bibliográfica generando el primer marco teórico cuatridimensional integral que articula dimensiones previamente fragmentadas en la literatura especializada sobre transparencia y control de contralorías latinoamericanas.
This research aims to develop a comprehensive four-dimensional theoretical framework that articulates transparency as a systemic strategy to strengthen territorial government auditing in Latin America. The study adopts a systematic theoretical-conceptual review design based on critical synthesis of convergent empirical evidence from Ecuador, Colombia, Peru, Brazil, and Chile during 2004-2025. The methodology employed 86 specialized sources through multiple triangulation and systematic documentary analysis. The framework proposes four dimensions: active territorial transparency, reactive territorial transparency, participatory territorial transparency, and technical territorial transparency, each with specific operational components and empirically validated measurement indicators. Institutional frameworks evidence differentiated characteristics, highlighting Ecuador's 2008 constitutional innovation, Brazil's technological leadership with tools like ALICE, Peru's experiences in technological modernization, Colombia's systemic integration developments, and Chile's continuous improvement analyses. The model establishes six guiding principles: differentiated territoriality, systemic integrality, evidence-based continuous improvement, multilevel participation, responsible technological innovation, and constitutional supremacy. This research transcends bibliographic systematization by generating the first comprehensive four-dimensional theoretical framework that articulates previously fragmented dimensions in specialized literature on transparency and control of Latin American comptroller offices.
This research aims to develop a comprehensive four-dimensional theoretical framework that articulates transparency as a systemic strategy to strengthen territorial government auditing in Latin America. The study adopts a systematic theoretical-conceptual review design based on critical synthesis of convergent empirical evidence from Ecuador, Colombia, Peru, Brazil, and Chile during 2004-2025. The methodology employed 86 specialized sources through multiple triangulation and systematic documentary analysis. The framework proposes four dimensions: active territorial transparency, reactive territorial transparency, participatory territorial transparency, and technical territorial transparency, each with specific operational components and empirically validated measurement indicators. Institutional frameworks evidence differentiated characteristics, highlighting Ecuador's 2008 constitutional innovation, Brazil's technological leadership with tools like ALICE, Peru's experiences in technological modernization, Colombia's systemic integration developments, and Chile's continuous improvement analyses. The model establishes six guiding principles: differentiated territoriality, systemic integrality, evidence-based continuous improvement, multilevel participation, responsible technological innovation, and constitutional supremacy. This research transcends bibliographic systematization by generating the first comprehensive four-dimensional theoretical framework that articulates previously fragmented dimensions in specialized literature on transparency and control of Latin American comptroller offices.
Description
Vol. 5, No. 11