Predictores de la violencia ejercida contra la mujer en departamentos de alta prevalencia del Perú
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Revista UNITEPC
Abstract
Objetivo. Identificar los predictores de la violencia ejercida contra la mujer en departamentos de alta prevalencia del Perú. Métodos. Estudio observacional, analítico y transversal. Se realizó un análisis secundario de la Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar-ENDES 2019. La muestra fue probabilística, de áreas, estratificada, multietápica e independiente en cada departamento estudiado. Fueron incluidas 108 mujeres convivientes o casadas que respondieron al módulo de violencia. Se llevaron a cabo análisis descriptivos y regresiones logísticas univariadas y multivariadas para muestras complejas, teniendo en cuenta las características sociodemográficas como predictores a través del cálculo del odds ratio (OR) con sus intervalos de confianza al 95%. Resultados. La probabilidad de padecer algún tipo de violencia fue de 3,56 veces más en las convivientes, respecto a las casadas, ajustado por haber padecido de violencia en la niñez, no pertenecer al comedor popular y no estar afiliada al Programa Nacional Cuna Más (Área ROC = 72,27%). La probabilidad de padecer violencia física fue 2,91 veces más en mujeres con antecedente de violencia en la niñez y 3,91 veces más para el caso de la violencia económica; en el caso de violencia psicológica, la probabilidad fue 4,30 veces más en las convivientes, respecto a las casadas y 4,18 veces más en el caso de la violencia sexual. Conclusiones. Existen predictores como el hecho de ser conviviente, haber sufrido violencia en la niñez y la no pertenencia a programas sociales, los cuales son predictores de la violencia contra la mujer.
Objective. To identify predictors of violence against women in high prevalence departments of Peru. Methods. Observational, analytical and cross-sectional study. A secondary analysis of the Demographic and Family Health Survey-ENDES 2019 was carried out. The sample was probabilistic, area-based, stratified, multistage and independent in each department studied. A total of 108 cohabiting or married women who responded to the violence module were included. Descriptive analyses and univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were carried out for complex samples, taking into account sociodemographic characteristics as predictors through the calculation of the odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence intervals. Results. The probability of suffering some type of violence was 3.56 times higher in cohabiting women than in married women, adjusted for having suffered violence in childhood, not belonging to the soup kitchen and not being affiliated to the Cuna Más National Program (ROC area = 72.27%). The probability of suffering physical violence was 2.91 times higher in women with a history of violence in childhood and 3.91 times higher in the case of economic violence; in the case of psychological violence, the probability was 4.30 times higher in cohabiting women than in married women and 4.18 times higher in the case of sexual violence. Conclusions. There are predictors such as the fact of being a cohabitant, having suffered violence in childhood and not belonging to social programs, which are predictors of violence against women.
Objective. To identify predictors of violence against women in high prevalence departments of Peru. Methods. Observational, analytical and cross-sectional study. A secondary analysis of the Demographic and Family Health Survey-ENDES 2019 was carried out. The sample was probabilistic, area-based, stratified, multistage and independent in each department studied. A total of 108 cohabiting or married women who responded to the violence module were included. Descriptive analyses and univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were carried out for complex samples, taking into account sociodemographic characteristics as predictors through the calculation of the odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence intervals. Results. The probability of suffering some type of violence was 3.56 times higher in cohabiting women than in married women, adjusted for having suffered violence in childhood, not belonging to the soup kitchen and not being affiliated to the Cuna Más National Program (ROC area = 72.27%). The probability of suffering physical violence was 2.91 times higher in women with a history of violence in childhood and 3.91 times higher in the case of economic violence; in the case of psychological violence, the probability was 4.30 times higher in cohabiting women than in married women and 4.18 times higher in the case of sexual violence. Conclusions. There are predictors such as the fact of being a cohabitant, having suffered violence in childhood and not belonging to social programs, which are predictors of violence against women.
Description
Vol. 8, No. 1