Autoridad algorítmica: ¿cómo empezar a pensar la protección de los derechos humanos en la era del “big data”?
| dc.contributor.author | René Urueña | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Bolivia | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-22T15:03:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-22T15:03:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description | Citaciones: 9 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Recent technological changes have set the stage for the rise of algorithmic authority as a new and particular way of exercising power. This paper seeks to enrich the legal vocabulary that will allow this new kind of authority to be understood as a legal phenomenon. Furthermore, it intends to contribute to debates over the normative models better suited to regulate algorithmic authority, within a human rights framework. Four main concepts are discussed: (1) algorithmic authority, (2) lex algorítmica, (3) autonomy, and (4) transparency. Analyzing these four concepts allows for a deeper understanding of the argumentative frameworks and legal theories that will regulate this new legal field. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.29263/lar02.2019.05 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.29263/lar02.2019.05 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://andeanlibrary.org/handle/123456789/50130 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad de Los Andes | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Latin American Law Review | |
| dc.source | Universidad de Los Andes | |
| dc.subject | Autonomy | |
| dc.subject | Normative | |
| dc.subject | Argumentative | |
| dc.subject | Transparency (behavior) | |
| dc.subject | Political science | |
| dc.subject | Humanities | |
| dc.subject | Human rights | |
| dc.subject | Field (mathematics) | |
| dc.subject | Sociology | |
| dc.subject | Law and economics | |
| dc.title | Autoridad algorítmica: ¿cómo empezar a pensar la protección de los derechos humanos en la era del “big data”? | |
| dc.type | article |