Medida cautelar y tutela jurisdiccional efectiva en la celeridad adjetiva por obligación alimentaria en ámbito judicial
Abstract
La medida cautelar y la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva son conceptos fundamentales en el ámbito del derecho procesal. Con el propósito de evaluar la eficacia y eficiencia de las medidas cautelares y la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva en el ámbito judicial peruano, específicamente en los casos de obligación alimentaria, identificando las causas de su deficiencia y proponiendo mejoras para garantizar una respuesta judicial más rápida y adecuada. La investigación se realizó con un diseño transeccional correlacional-causal, permitiendo describir vínculos entre variables en un momento determinado. La población estuvo constituida por 200 trabajadores, de los cuales se seleccionaron 132 como muestra representativa. Se utilizó una encuesta con cuestionarios para la recolección de datos, garantizando la validez y confiabilidad mediante un proceso riguroso y el coeficiente de Cronbach. Se obtuvieron los permisos necesarios y se aseguró la confidencialidad de los participantes. El procesamiento de los datos se realizó con IBM SPSS® versión 25, aplicando técnicas estadísticas descriptivas y pruebas de hipótesis, incluyendo Chi-cuadrado y Pseudo R cuadrado. Casi la mitad de los involucrados en el estudio evaluó como regular la medida cautelar y la tutela efectiva; el 42.4% consideró regular la celeridad procesal. La celeridad adjetiva depende en un 72% de estas variables. Se concluye que las medidas cautelares mejoran la celeridad en procesos alimentarios judiciales.
The precautionary measure and effective judicial protection are fundamental concepts in the field of procedural law. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of precautionary measures and effective judicial protection within the Peruvian judicial system, specifically in cases of alimony obligations, identifying the causes of their deficiencies and proposing improvements to ensure a faster and more adequate judicial response. The research was conducted using a correlational-causal cross-sectional design, allowing for the description of relationships between variables at a specific point in time. The population consisted of 200 workers, with 132 selected as a representative sample. A survey with questionnaires was used for data collection, ensuring validity and reliability through a rigorous process and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Necessary permissions were obtained, and participant confidentiality was ensured. Data processing was carried out using IBM SPSS® version 25, applying descriptive statistical techniques and hypothesis tests, including Chi-square and Pseudo R-squared. Nearly half of the participants evaluated the precautionary measure and effective protection as regular; 42.4% considered procedural speed to be regular. Procedural speed depends 72% on these variables. It is concluded that precautionary measures improve the speed of judicial processes related to alimony obligations.
The precautionary measure and effective judicial protection are fundamental concepts in the field of procedural law. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of precautionary measures and effective judicial protection within the Peruvian judicial system, specifically in cases of alimony obligations, identifying the causes of their deficiencies and proposing improvements to ensure a faster and more adequate judicial response. The research was conducted using a correlational-causal cross-sectional design, allowing for the description of relationships between variables at a specific point in time. The population consisted of 200 workers, with 132 selected as a representative sample. A survey with questionnaires was used for data collection, ensuring validity and reliability through a rigorous process and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Necessary permissions were obtained, and participant confidentiality was ensured. Data processing was carried out using IBM SPSS® version 25, applying descriptive statistical techniques and hypothesis tests, including Chi-square and Pseudo R-squared. Nearly half of the participants evaluated the precautionary measure and effective protection as regular; 42.4% considered procedural speed to be regular. Procedural speed depends 72% on these variables. It is concluded that precautionary measures improve the speed of judicial processes related to alimony obligations.
Description
Vol. 5, No. 10