Inferencias causales de profesores que realizan la lectura de textos con implicancia causal y subordinación oracional
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Fides Et Ratio
Abstract
La investigación describe el estudio experimental en inferencias causales durante la lectura de textos breves de profesores (lectores expertos) del distrito de San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima (N= 36). Se compararon las inferencias de tres grupos de lectores de dos tipos de texto (Caso 1: nexo conectivo oracional, n= 14; y caso 2: oraciones con estructura subordinada. n= 14) y un grupo control (n= 11). El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar las inferencias causales bajo el enfoque de comprensión durante la lectura (McKoon y Ratcliff), con la finalidad de los lectores habituales para generar una coherencia local de comprensión del texto, a lo cual se añaden las propuestas de subordinación oracional de Belart (2004) y Sorókina (2008). Los resultados revelan que las inferencias causales son más acertadas en sujetos que leen textos con nexo oracional que aquellos lectores de textos con oraciones subordinadas (F (35) = 0.74; x (aciertos)= 11.56; SC (aciertos)= 130,2; p<.01), y el tiempo de lectura y de respuesta fueron mediadores significativos en la realización de dichas inferencias (p< .05).
The research describes the experimental study in causal inferences during the reading of short texts of teachers (expert readers) of the district of San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima (N = 36). We compared the inferences of three groups of readers of two types of text (Case 1: sentence connective nexus, n = 14 and case 2: sentences with subordinate structure, n = 14) and a control group (n = 11). The aim of the study was to evaluate causal inferences under the comprehension approach during reading (McKoon and Ratcliff), with the purpose of the usual readers to generate a local coherence of comprehension of the text, to which are added the proposals of sentence subordination Of Belart (2004) and Sorókina (2008). The results reveal that the causal inferences are more accurate in subjects who read texts with sentence relations than those readers of texts with subordinate clauses (F (35) = 0.74, x (hits) = 11.56, SC (successes) = 130.2; P <.01), and reading and response time were significant mediators in the realization of these inferences (p <.05).
The research describes the experimental study in causal inferences during the reading of short texts of teachers (expert readers) of the district of San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima (N = 36). We compared the inferences of three groups of readers of two types of text (Case 1: sentence connective nexus, n = 14 and case 2: sentences with subordinate structure, n = 14) and a control group (n = 11). The aim of the study was to evaluate causal inferences under the comprehension approach during reading (McKoon and Ratcliff), with the purpose of the usual readers to generate a local coherence of comprehension of the text, to which are added the proposals of sentence subordination Of Belart (2004) and Sorókina (2008). The results reveal that the causal inferences are more accurate in subjects who read texts with sentence relations than those readers of texts with subordinate clauses (F (35) = 0.74, x (hits) = 11.56, SC (successes) = 130.2; P <.01), and reading and response time were significant mediators in the realization of these inferences (p <.05).
Description
Vol. 14, No. 14