Ceguera estructural del derecho y sujetos colectivos: desafíos para una justicia inclusiva
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Tribunal
Abstract
El propósito principal de la investigación fue realizar una revisión crítica del tratamiento normativo de la tutela procesal colectiva en diferentes sistemas jurídicos. Para dicho fin se realizó un estudio jurídico-teórico con enfoque cualitativo. Se evidencia una ceguera estructural del derecho procesal, centrado históricamente en conflictos individuales, sin adaptarse a las necesidades de los colectivos. En Iberoamérica, solo Colombia y México cuentan con leyes específicas; asimismo existe el código modelo de procesos colectivos, mientras que España no presenta regulación alguna con elementos propios del litigio colectivo. La Directiva (UE) 2020/1828 regula los organismos habilitados sin fines de lucro en representación y la inclusión de las acciones reparatorias. Empero aún están los rezagos del proceso clásico en su tratamiento con un sistema opt in, sin solución de financiamiento.
The main purpose of the research was to carry out a critical review of the normative treatment of collective procedural protection in different legal systems. To this end, a legal-theoretical study with a qualitative approach was carried out. A structural blindness of procedural law is evident, historically focused on individual conflicts, without adapting to the needs of collectives. In Latin America, only Colombia and Mexico have specific laws; there is also a model code of collective proceedings, while Spain does not have any regulation with elements specific to collective litigation. Directive (EU) 2020/1828 regulates qualified non-profit representative bodies and the inclusion of restorative actions. However, there are still the lags of the classic process in its treatment with an opt-in system, with no funding solution.
The main purpose of the research was to carry out a critical review of the normative treatment of collective procedural protection in different legal systems. To this end, a legal-theoretical study with a qualitative approach was carried out. A structural blindness of procedural law is evident, historically focused on individual conflicts, without adapting to the needs of collectives. In Latin America, only Colombia and Mexico have specific laws; there is also a model code of collective proceedings, while Spain does not have any regulation with elements specific to collective litigation. Directive (EU) 2020/1828 regulates qualified non-profit representative bodies and the inclusion of restorative actions. However, there are still the lags of the classic process in its treatment with an opt-in system, with no funding solution.
Description
Vol. 5, No. 13
Keywords
Intereses individuales homogéneos, Procesos colectivos, Intereses supraindividuales, Tutela de derechos, Acciones de representación, Homogeneous individual interests, Collective proceedings, Supra-individual interests, Protection of rights, Representative actions, Interesses individuais homogêneos, Processos coletivos, Interesses supraindividuais, Proteção de direitos, Ações representativas