Gestión de la inversión pública para la formación de capital en universidades públicas
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Impulso
Abstract
La gestión de la inversión pública (GIP) como factor estratégico para la excelencia académica y el desarrollo universitario, es muchas veces relegada, aun siendo clave para la eficiencia de las inversiones, vía la formación de capital (FK). El objetivo fue analizar cómo la GIP favorece a la FK en universidades públicas, para lo cual se ha desarrollado una investigación básica, con enfoque cualitativo y diseño fenomenológico, entrevistando a 12 gestores universitarios empleando una guía de entrevista y efectuando el análisis en el ATLAS.ti 23. Los resultados evidencian que la GIP ha contribuido parcialmente a la FK físico e intangible, con efectos limitados, fragmentados, inequitativos y escasamente aprovechados, debido a problemas estructurales en la gestión institucional y una débil gobernabilidad. Se concluye que la GIP no logra consolidarse como catalizadora de la FK, no obstante, podría revertirse fortaleciendo el ciclo de la inversión pública y la adopción de un marco estratégico.
Public investment management (PIM) as a strategic factor for academic excellence and university development is often overlooked, even though it is key to investment efficiency through capital formation (CF). The objective was to analyze how PIM favors CF in public universities. A qualitative, phenomenologically designed basic research project was conducted. Twelve university administrators were interviewed using an interview guide and the analysis was conducted using ATLAS.ti 23. The results show that PIM has partially contributed to physical and intangible CF, with limited, fragmented, inequitable, and underutilized effects due to structural problems in institutional management and weak governance. It is concluded that PIM has failed to consolidate itself as a catalyst for CF; however, this could be reversed by strengthening the public investment cycle and adopting a strategic framework.
Public investment management (PIM) as a strategic factor for academic excellence and university development is often overlooked, even though it is key to investment efficiency through capital formation (CF). The objective was to analyze how PIM favors CF in public universities. A qualitative, phenomenologically designed basic research project was conducted. Twelve university administrators were interviewed using an interview guide and the analysis was conducted using ATLAS.ti 23. The results show that PIM has partially contributed to physical and intangible CF, with limited, fragmented, inequitable, and underutilized effects due to structural problems in institutional management and weak governance. It is concluded that PIM has failed to consolidate itself as a catalyst for CF; however, this could be reversed by strengthening the public investment cycle and adopting a strategic framework.
Description
Vol. 5, No. 12